April 9, 2016, the post system and judicial reform demonstration seminar was heldceremoniously in Nanjing, which is sponsored by the Southeast University School of law, the rule of law development and evaluation research center of Southeast University. More than 70 experts and scholars from the Supreme People's court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Beijing Municipal Higher People's court, Jiangsu Province Higher People's court, Peking University, Renmin University, Sichuan University, East China University of politics and law practice organs, institutions of higher learning and scientific research institutions  attended the meeting.

The day of the seminar is divided into the opening and keynote speech, the reform of the system of judges, prosecutors and the reform of the system and the provincial people's property.The meeting was held in the morning 8:30 on time, Dean of Southeast University School of law professor Liu Yanhong attended and presided over.Liu introduced the conference topics, and expressed a warm welcome and heartfelt thanks to the scholars and experts participated in the discussion.

At 10:20 in the morning, the meeting started the second units around the judge post system reform,hosted by Xu Qingyu ,the senior people's Court of Jiangsu Province Party member, director of the Political Department.

At 13:30 in the afternoon, the meeting started the third part of the study of the reform of the quota system of Prosecutors, chaired by senior prosecutor Xie Pengcheng, the Supreme People's Procuratorate procuratorial theory research institute deputy director.

The Supreme People's court China Applied Law Research Institute, senior judge Jiang Huiling presided over the fourth unit the provincial unified management of human property research. 

Southeast University law school Associate Dean Professor Ouyang Benqi sponsored the closing ceremony of the seminar, and on behalf of the Faculty of law of Southeast University, expressed our heartfelt thanks to participants.

 Judicial reform has entered a critical stage. At the time, high-qualified, multi-level experts and scholars convened together to the highly targeted conference, which had the extraordinary significance and meaning.The symposium had extremely wide coverage of the horizontal, vertically  directed cores of the problems and played the a significant role in guiding and promoting the theoretical research and judicial practice.he scene participants feel more productive, which made scene participants feel more productive.