At noon on October 28, 2019, the Law School's Legal Leadership Training Research and Student Evaluation Awards revised consultation meeting was held in the conference room of the Law School of the Southeast University Jiulonghu Campus. Law school party secretary Mao Huixi, dean Liu Yanhong, deputy secretary of the party committee and vice president Gao Ge, Professor Liu Lianjun and other teachers and representatives of the teaching and research departments and representatives of the undergraduate students,graduatestudents and doctoral students participated in the meeting.

On behalf of the college, Secretary Mao thanked the students for coming to provide advice and suggestions for the first-class law leadership talents, and said that the evaluation awards have an important guiding role for talent training.He hoped that the delegates would express their opinions and speak freely, and improve the evaluation system of scholarships. According to Miao Jinxin, due to the different entrance assessment criteria in the three majors, in the process of selecting the academic scholarship for the first year of the master's degree, the professional background should be considered comprehensively. Zhou Suxiang proposed that in the process of specific evaluation and evaluation, due to the different academic goals of masters and doctors, graduate students and doctoral students should be distinguished. Other student representatives also expressed their opinions and made suggestions on the problems existing in the current legal talent training and evaluation awards process.

Subsequently, Dean Liu summed up the suggestions made by the student representatives and pointed out that academic scholarships should always be guided by academic research. Excellent students and outstanding student cadres should be guided by comprehensive quality. It is necessary to establish a dual incentive mechanism to jointly promote the training of legal leading talents. . Secretary Mao stressed that in the process of cultivating students, we must not only pay attention to the cultivation of academic ability, but also develop the public morality of students and avoid the cultivation of exquisite self-interest.

The remaining participants also expressed their views on the suggestions made by the student representatives. Associate Professor Liu Qichuan believed that it is necessary for the graduate students and doctoral students to distinguish and develop the evaluation criteria. Associate Professor Chen Daoying mentioned that while improving the evaluation criteria for academic scholarships, it is also necessary to formulate rules for scholarships in a timely manner. Afterwards, the participating students discussed the relevant rules and methods.

At the end of the meeting, with the joint promotion of the participating teachers, many details were resolved. The survey promoted the full expression of the recommendations of the various parties in various ways, not only fully taking care of the different demands of students of different majors in different grades, but also deepening the exchanges between teachers and students. The meeting established a solid institutional consensus for the cultivation of leading talents in law and created a good atmosphere of cooperation between teachers and students.